Rail Plus Property Development in China: the Pilot Case of Shenzhen

February 28, 2017

China’s cities face significant challenges in financing the growth of urban transit infrastructure. The current practice of financing urban metro or subway projects through municipal fiscal revenues (partly from land concession fees) and government-backed bank loans is not only inadequate to meet the demand, but also exacerbates deep-seated problems. In a variety of approaches that aim to alleviate the financing problems of local governments, Rail plus Property (R+P) development offers a promising solution. R+P development leverages the partnership between the public sector, transit companies, and developers to coordinate planning and financing of transit systems and adjacent real-estate developments. By capturing the land value appreciation that follows transit projects, R+P can partly or completely fill the funding gaps in constructing costly metro projects. Despite these opportunities, the broad adoption of R+P development in Chinese cities is still hindered by widespread conceptual misunderstandings, lack of political will, and multiple legal, regulatory, and institutional limitations. This paper analyzes the experience of the coastal city of Shenzhen as a successful example of R+P experimentation in China.

Cities

Countries

Theme

External

Visit link

Downloads

Download
Related content
View all

Mobility

TOD Implementation Resources and Tools

Transit-oriented development, commonly known as TOD, is a planning and design strategy that focuses on creating urban development patterns which facilitate the use of public transit,walking and
Knowledge Product

Learn more

Mobility

Creating a world class culture of ecomobility: the case of Kaohsiung City

This case study showcases that how cities through concerted efforts can make a shift toward an ecomobile culture within their jurisdiction. Kaohsiung is committed to developing a world class culture
Knowledge Product

Learn more

Mobility

Sustainable and Safe: A Vision and Guidance for Zero Road Deaths

The “Safe System” approach requires a shift in responsibility from the people using roads to the people designing them. It is a systemic approach that integrates core management elements and action
Knowledge Product

Learn more